what you like better superNOVA or Itg2??Say why

[flcl573]

That's a solid arguement, eh?
_________________

[Iman]

[patrickphan2]

itg2 is better, bloodrush is gangster. supernova is ok but i like extreme better. extreme+supernova songlist on a supernova machine will pwn itg2. but itg2 is better
_________________

Tyrgannus wrote:

Synaesthesia wrote: Thread now delivers. Yeah, unfortunately it isn't DiGiorno

[BustAGroovey]

[Da Bar]

[Lobster Jesus]

[Da Bar]

[DAF]

They're two different games. Why can't people get that through their heads?

It's like debating on whether Sonic or Mario is better. They both involve running around and jumping but they're still very different in how they play.
_________________

Drink up baby, stay up all night
With the things you could do
You won't but you might
The potential you'll be that you'll never see
The promises you'll only make

[powerplug]

[Tyrgannus]

[flcl573]

Crash was definitely not as popular as Mario was.

Mario > Sonic for me, because the gameplay is more solid and technical, and Super Mario World (Sonic 1's competition) was great.
_________________

[BustAGroovey]

[Sweet Potato]

Okay everyone. Listen up. I played both ITG2 and SuperNOVA and I am a very unbiased person. I played one set of songs on each. They were both very impressive in my eyes. I can play the extremely hard songs like 11s but I actually enjoy playing 8s and 9s more. So here is my opinion.

Most of you would think that ITG is only good for the very hard songs but I actually found the easier songs I played to be a blast. I don't quite remember the names because I don't know anything about ITG (I think one song was called Peaches or something). But the cabinet I played on was sweet (although a little sticky) and it was hard to hear the game due to a radio blasting pop music. Through all this I still found the game to be super duper. A much needed improvement to the ITG game I own for ps2.

On the other hand SuperNOVA was also pretty fun but the fun was restricted by an additional 20 greats per song. Pretty much my entire set was offsync. But when the patch comes out to fix this it shouldn't be a problem anymore. Flowers was an amazing song and its sync was fine. Konami, just fix the sync and give us the unlock codes for a bunch of higher difficulty songs and you could end up very nice. Chop chop.

Overall, I think ITG2 takes the cake. Just by a tiny bit. Though people will complain that the charts suck, the ones I played were quite entertaining. Though I don't like songs that are hard for the sake of hard. I want to get "in the groove" not "in the hospital" so ITG2 still is a good game for the not-so-competitive player.

SuperNOVA falls a tiny bit behind due to sync errors and not too many interesting 10s. Get the patch and get the unlocks and this will probably be right up there with ITG2.

I hope some of you appreciate my opinion and don't just go "psh I still think SN blows. Roxor for life!" Fanboyism gets nobody anywhere. Anyone who is pure DDR or pure ITG should give the other a chance. Oh and for PIU, I have yet to play on a PIU machine or home version so I will not give an opinion on that. It's probably just another good dancing game.

[Tyrgannus]

Wow, that was actually mature. Thanks man (Note:, that wasn't sarcasm)

I play DDR and ITG. ITG more at home than DDR, and DDR more in the arcades (Probably because there aren't as many ITG machines if truth be told.)

You know what? I don't think I'll stop playing DDR anytime soon, especially Extreme. It's just a lot of fun, and I don't feel like I'm pushed to *** something. Props to DDR, it was got me from sucking at light to AA'ing Max300.

Ok, now that I gave DDR its props, here's my take on ITG. ITG builds off of the concept of DDR. It takes it one step further, in technique and difficulty. You don't have to pick songs with hands, mines, or rolls if you don't like the new techniques, but it gives it more variety that they're there, and likewise you don't have to play 11s, 12s, and 13s if you think they're just stupid hard, but it provides a challenge to the masterful who indeed can do them consistantly.

Now, because Mr. God brought it up (LOl on the name, are we narsicistic or something?), I'll talk about PIU. PIU has a fairly annoying interface that takes a few sets to truly get used to, but once you do, you will experience some of the most creative stepcharts around, and also some of the most BS. PIU is the hardest arrowsmash game, so I don't know why ITG always gets laughed at for being stupid hard when PIU exists. The problem many people find with the game is not getting used to the 5-panel layout. I can't help you with that, some people do, some people don't, but don't bash the game because you can't get used to 5-panel.

So, we have 3 good dance game series. Unfortunately for DDR it came out with SN, and unfortunately for SN, it came out at a time of reawakening in the dance community, probably due in part to ITG. This was a problem because people focus on score a lot now, and well, SN is offsync as hell. Sure, it will probably be fixed or at least vastly improved, but for now it is a chore to play the game due to the streams of greats as opposed to just having a good time.

Who wins in music selection? DDR. It has so many songs it's not funny
Who wins in difficulty? PIU, though stuff like LAIDZ 2 is just dumb kinda
Who wins in scoring system? ITG without a doubt
Who wins in stepcharts? Pure opinion
Who wins in interesting music? Pure opinion?

Which is the most fun? Pure opinion


I find ITG the hardest, though I actually do not consider myself a RoxoR fanboy. If I ever complain about DDR, I complain about SN, and that's because I love Extreme so much it was a disappointment.

End of rambling, sorry
_________________

AA Bob wrote:

Summer is as much of a 12 as PSMO is a 9.

[uouuɐ]

[Marq(uistadorous)]

[Da Bar]

[A2P]

attention Black Sakura Black:

Get the fuck out of Illinois.