View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Darkicarus Trick Member
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Location: Hudson valley playing DDR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thomas Hobbes Trick Member
Joined: 20 Aug 2002 Location: San Francisco // NorCal |
1. Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I'm a purely visual player and I am a speeder.
ITG: 600+bpm no problem.
DDR: 400/450bpm maximum.
Yeah, wtf. =/ _________________
"I am about to take my last voyage, a great leap in the dark."
| Pics | Play-Asia | |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phantm Trick Member
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Location: pennsylvania |
2. Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I play DDR at about 400-450, what speed should I be able to play ITG at. The closest ITG machine is in NJ I'm in PA. That sucks. _________________
lollerblades! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thomas Hobbes Trick Member
Joined: 20 Aug 2002 Location: San Francisco // NorCal |
3. Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know. I use the bar and that's what I feel comfortable with on ITG. _________________
"I am about to take my last voyage, a great leap in the dark."
| Pics | Play-Asia | |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DJTyrant Maniac Member
Joined: 25 Jan 2002 Location: Ventura, CA |
4. Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I find the background on DDR to be brighter/more distracting. That's just me though. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marilla Basic Member
Joined: 25 Apr 2004
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tyler2dx Trick Member
Joined: 09 May 2004
|
6. Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find that most good Itg players suck at ddr. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paranoia_Brother Trick Member
Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Location: Clarkston, MI |
7. Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DarkIcarius wrote: | for example in ddr whenever i put a song on x2 sight reading would be easier, but opposed to ITG when I put a song on x2 sight reading is ALOT easier much easier then x2 in DDR. |
I've noticed that too. I play most of my songs on ITG with x2.5 or x3, as opposed to DDR with x1.5 or x.2. What i think it is, is the display screen. In ITGs, it feels alot bigger so you can see the arrows earlier, the arrows are alot higher and the arrows are also smaller. DDR, though, has wider more bulkier arrows and don't have such a huge screen. That's what i think it is... but otherwise i completly agree. _________________
*Formerly known as That DDR guy at Gr. Lakes* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
diddrstrait Trick Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2004
|
8. Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ResidentBadass wrote: | I find that most good Itg players suck at ddr. |
explain. name a few players that are excellent at ITG and suck at DDR. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AFAD Trick Member
Joined: 18 Feb 2004 Location: So. Cal/ LA area |
9. Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Syncognition wrote: |
explain. name a few players that are excellent at ITG and suck at DDR. |
only one i know of..Blue Chaos _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
j² Basic Member
Joined: 16 Aug 2005 Location: s.cali |
10. Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
the flashing arrows in ddr are much more prominent (distracting) than in itg..
plus, the overall tone/theme of itg is also much more subdued and melancholic -- that is, not overly saturated with color like ddr. which is easier on the eyes of the older folks who don't necessarily find the bling bling as appealing as the youngins..
Syncognition wrote: | ResidentBadass wrote: | I find that most good Itg players suck at ddr. |
explain. name a few players that are excellent at ITG and suck at DDR. |
i am one. though, i'm just a caliber at the mediocre level=]
but i'd imagine it may be just as difficult for a player to go from ddr -> itg.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceiling.Kimmy Trick Member
Joined: 01 Mar 2002 Location: not SoCal |
11. Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ResidentBadass wrote: | I find that most good Itg players suck at ddr. |
I don't know. Sometimes I see it the otherway around too, so I don't think the case is that common as you think. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AkiraKinyota Basic Member
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Location: Richmond (Henrico), VA |
12. Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eh.. I'm still getting used to Hard Mode on ITG. But I am a Heavy player on DDR, and is currently working on clearing some 9 footers with at least a B.
I've never noticed about the arrows being smaller or taller in ITG though, but now that I think of it.. yeah. Not that much flashing colours either, I can see the arrows much clearer in ITG than DDR. The "Hallway" option puts more arrows on the screen too.
But both the speed mods in ITG and DDR seem the same. Don't they just multiply by the number that you choose? 300 x 1.5 or 300 x 2 or 300 x 2.5 Aren't they the same in both games? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
FujiFlame Trick Member
Joined: 15 Sep 2004 Location: Orlando, FL |
13. Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't be suprised if FPS or even pixel depth is an issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darkicarus Trick Member
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Location: Hudson valley playing DDR |
14. Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AkiraKinyota wrote: |
But both the speed mods in ITG and DDR seem the same. Don't they just multiply by the number that you choose? 300 x 1.5 or 300 x 2 or 300 x 2.5 Aren't they the same in both games? |
well no because there is no x2.5 in ddr, so the mods are still a little bit different, there must be some distinct way of telling, im not sure how though _________________
"like.. wtf" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Almost Crimes Trick Member
Joined: 10 Jul 2004
|
15. Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's true, I play like ~320ish BPM in DDR but I can play ~500 on ITG. _________________
"Personally... I'll play anything. Its a dancing game and thats all right. If I dont like it, I won't play it. If I do, I will. Even if some God forsaken "dancing simulation" game titled "Bill Blanks' Extreme Tae Bo Pumping Dance Party Collection Groove feat. Montel Williams" were to ever stick its ugly face out from under my bed, I'd still play the damn thing. "
-The Strong Julio! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Special_ned Trick Member
Joined: 07 Apr 2004
|
16. Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its definatly a FPS issue as well. When i play ITG on my TV, its like marbles rolling on a sheet of glass. When i play DDR or Stepmania even, I cant go nearly as fast with the speed mods and it takes a few songs to get used to reading the noteskins again. _________________
My sig, Ver:1.85 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rancidfish Trick Member
Joined: 29 Jun 2002 Location: Santa Rosa, CA/Santa Cruz, CA |
17. Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
On ITG, I can barely read 600 BPM. (VerTex, 1x)
On DDR, I can't quite read 500 BPM. (LoM extra stage)
However, it doesn't really matter, because I'm more comfortable with a specific spacing than a specific speed. I tend to play 1x on anything fairly simple, 1.5x on anything with long complex 1/16th runs, and 2x on the rare song that still confuses me on 1x. These rules apply whether a song is 30 BPM or 300. It's more about the notes themselves than the tempo.
Also, the noteskin on ITG makes things so much easier to read. It took me a long time to learn to see the difference between 1/8th notes and gallops in DDR, and the difference between triplets and 1/16ths still gets me sometimes. On the other hand, ITG's noteskin makes it easy to tell what's a quarter, 1/8th, 1/16th, triplet... and even 1/32nds and 1/64ths are quite visibly obvious. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
L. Trick Member
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 Location: Chicago |
18. Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
ITG Vertex (1) (fucking around ITGCS Novice for stars, FA and PA sucks on higher difficulties) @ 1200ish no problem
DDR Max 300 (H) x2 @ 600 ouch bad very bad _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Syncopation Trick Member
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
|
19. Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From my own observations...
DDR "vivid" arrows (3rd mix and beyond) never have a distinct color unless one specifically uses the Solo arrow modification (which also requires a DDR machine version that actually has that modification). Otherwise, the aqua and purplish colors of the eighth and sixteenth arrows are always somewhat obscured by some other "overlay" color up until just before the arrow reaches the target zone.
In contrast, ITG's default Metal arrow scheme--and even the Cell arrow scheme--still has a very distinct color scheme for the beat subdivisions: the red is always red, the blue is always blue, the yellowish arrows are always yellowish, and the purple is always purple... and those colors are never overlayed by another obscuring color (except for possibly the Vivid arrow scheme introduce in ITG2).
From there, it also becomes a matter of arrow spacing. For me, certain songs--especially those with sixteenth note figures, often look jammed up at 1x speed, both for ITG and DDR, so I tend to use 1x only for songs above 180 bpm that have no sixteenths, 1.5x for songs between 100bpm and 180bpm that have sixteenth figures, and 2x for songs below 100bpm that have sixteenth figures. Any faster than 2x, though, and I'm playing by reflex and unable to read ahead to see the "step phrasing" and anticipate the step combinations.
Plus, when I play ITG, I also use Hallway instead of Overhead, which I find seems to scroll a bit slower than overhead mode, so a combination of 1.5x/Hallway/Metal for most songs that don't have sudden slowdown sections with sixteenth figures is quite reasonable for sightreading (but then again, I'm not playing above level 9 on ITG).
However, another oddity I find is that I am terrible at reading 1x on DDR Extreme machines, however, with a few exceptions (Orion 78 for example), I can read 1x just fine when I revert to playing DDR Konamix at home, which has a much lower framerate when compared to DDR Extreme. I don't understand it, but I still play 1x better on that older home DDR version even using type 1 arrows instead of type 2 arrows, and even without using Solo mode. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|