View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
matthew Trick Member
Joined: 01 Aug 2004
|
0. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:43 am Post subject: C200, C400 and speed mod usage |
|
|
I am not here to say "mods suck" or something else stupid since I use them myself. I won't even respond unless someone flames mes. I would hate it for this thread to turn into one of those arguments again. But I do have (what I believe) is a legitimate question.
It is a my understanding that people find the usage of C300, C400 mods on ITG to be cheap and they disqualify people for rankings for songs with tempo changes. However at the same time, most people I see who use speed mods pick them depending on the 1x scroll speed (eg. 5x for stuff under 100 bpm, 3x for 100-150 bpm etc.). Of course, people who play everything on one speed are not part of this question.
Could someone explain C mods are considered cheap but speed mod usage I described is not? I feel both things I am describing are equivalent. The only point I can think of is that the mod usage I described allows for some variation on scroll speed where C mods do not. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boochypa Trick Member
Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: VA Tech |
1. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's a reason Cmods only DQ you if the song has BPM changes or stops.
Consider Euphoria (expert) on 3x, then look at it on C400. One of the challenges of that song is trying to FA the very very slow part, which is no longer very very slow if you slap a Cmod on it. This makes the song easier to FA, thus DQing your score. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Slowpoke Trick Member
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
|
2. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:20 am Post subject: Re: C200, C400 and speed mod usage |
|
|
matthew wrote: | Could someone explain C mods are considered cheap but speed mod usage I described is not? |
Because people go to a C mod not to get the scroll rate they want, but to eliminate the effect of pauses and BPM changes.
On the other hand, I think it's "cheap" when stepchart designers put in artificial slowdowns just to force a player to read densely-packed arrows. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmon Vivid Member
Joined: 01 Nov 2002 Location: Tokyo, Japan(i wish) at 559 area |
3. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
you guys should bring this in the ITG Thread since there is no C mods in DDR _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Slowpoke Trick Member
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
|
4. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
trupnoi wrote: | you guys should bring this in the ITG Thread since there is no C mods in DDR |
But there are in Stepmania... so maybe we should go to the simulators thread instead. So confusing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmon Vivid Member
Joined: 01 Nov 2002 Location: Tokyo, Japan(i wish) at 559 area |
5. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
indeed _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BraveLittleToaster Trick Member
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
|
6. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I only use C400 on ITG on songs that do not have bmp changes. If it does, then I use normal mods. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
matthew Trick Member
Joined: 01 Aug 2004
|
7. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
slowpoke, your reasoning works for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sherl0k Maniac Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2002 Location: the internet |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LET ME SHOW YOU THEM Vivid Member
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Location: Mountain View/Sunnyvale CA |
9. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They don't have a Cmod fast enough for me _________________
theficionado wrote: | Seriously, they should make some sort of spray for you. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
10. Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think people consider CMods "cheap" unless they DQ, in which case they remove part of the challenge of the stepchart. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Karl Popper Trick Member
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
|
11. Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SPF5.Kiba wrote: | I don't think people consider CMods "cheap" unless they DQ, in which case they remove part of the challenge of the stepchart. |
Exactly. There is nothing magical about the numbers 400 and 500; to condemn them is tantamount to condemning speed mods in general, and while I understand that there are critics of speed mods I don't see any logical basis for just criticizing C-mods (unless they disqualify of course). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LET ME SHOW YOU THEM Vivid Member
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Location: Mountain View/Sunnyvale CA |
12. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The main *Decent* argument i've heard against Cmods is the fact that right now, if your comfort bpm isn't 300, 400, or 500, you can't deal into your ideal bpm. For example, a friend of mine is really comfortable around 450 or so, but it isn't easy getting exactly that, so he either has to play stuff that is too slow, or too fast. I've been hearing rumors (and i hope they are true) that ITG2 will allow you to have one custom x mod (like 3.5x) and one custom Cmod (C602 plz) that you'd write in your editable.ini on your memory card..that would definitely make things interesting.. _________________
theficionado wrote: | Seriously, they should make some sort of spray for you. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
matthew Trick Member
Joined: 01 Aug 2004
|
13. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
i wasn't my intention to criticize C mods, i just wanted a better understanding for my own self. i'm sorry if i gave that impression.
but there are some who think C mods, no mines/hands are fine even if they do DQ (points to AIJ poll, i hope they were kidding) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Reznor Trick Member
Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Location: Coquitlam, BC |
14. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
How did I know that this was going to be one of the first things posted on DDRFreak about ITG? >_> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djfmf Trick Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Location: San Diego |
15. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
does anyone know why playing "on a day like today 134bpm" would disqualify from ranking if you put it on c300? it doesn't show a speed change so it doesn't make sense on why i got DQ. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Soda Trick Member
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
|
16. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It probably has a pause somewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Karl Popper Trick Member
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
|
17. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
djfmf wrote: | does anyone know why playing "on a day like today 134bpm" would disqualify from ranking if you put it on c300? it doesn't show a speed change so it doesn't make sense on why i got DQ. |
Actually the bpm does fluctuate between 133.8 and 134.2 in random parts of the song, it's really rather dumb. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arctic Wolves Trick Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Canada |
18. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, On A Day Like Today pulls a Night in Motion; the BPM changes, but so slightly that, given the rounding engine of the BPM indicator, it stays static at 134BPM. Perhaps it would be an idea to make songs that change BPM have differently coloured indicators, like in DDRMAX and MAX2, because it is impossible to know before hand that putting a C mod on On A Day Like Today will disqualify you unless you are aware of this tempo change. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
diddrstrait Trick Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2004
|
19. Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arctic Wolves wrote: | Yeah, On A Day Like Today pulls a Night in Motion; the BPM changes, but so slightly that, given the rounding engine of the BPM indicator, it stays static at 134BPM. Perhaps it would be an idea to make songs that change BPM have differently coloured indicators, like in DDRMAX and MAX2, because it is impossible to know before hand that putting a C mod on On A Day Like Today will disqualify you unless you are aware of this tempo change. |
well it WILL say at the bottom of the screen in the mods menu that you will be disqualified for using the mod on that song. also, the bpm indicator in the options screen next to the speed mod settings says BPM: 134-134, indicating a slight change. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|