Forums FAQForums FAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Login to check your private messagesLogin to check your private messages   LoginLogin 

How about a restriction on stickie threads...
Goto page 1, 2  Next  
This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies    DDR Freak Forum Index -> Site Feedback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Anima
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2002
Location: GA Tech www.gatech.edu
0. PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 4:24 pm    Post subject: How about a restriction on stickie threads... Reply with quote

Just recently some brand new member decided to post in the Extreme sticky in the Console Games area. I don't have a problem with it, but the person couldn't wait long enough for their submission to go through so they submitted 4 times. Is it feasible and fair to say that basic members shouldn't be able to post in stickies but only read them until they gain trick status? I mean just exactly what limitations are in place on people who might join and post once to never return? E19.gif
_________________
Energy. Reality. Fear. Revolt. Trust Yourself, and you'll know the way.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
VxJasonxV
Maniac Member
Maniac Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2002
Location: Castle Rock, CO
1. PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:05 pm    Post subject: Re: How about a restriction on stickie threads... Reply with quote

Anima wrote:
Is it feasible and fair to say that basic members shouldn't be able to post in stickies but only read them until they gain trick status?

It's feasible, but VERY unfair. One person should ruin it for the rest?

Anima wrote:
I mean just exactly what limitations are in place on people who might join and post once to never return? E19.gif

...none.
We have tons of users who register and don't post anything, for one reason or another. And we won't remove these members because they might use it for machine locations and not care about posting.
_________________


Amusing Pictures: lolddrfreak | Road of LoQ
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website Xbox Live Gamertag
Larrikin
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Feb 2002
Location: Illadelphia
2. PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally I liked the idea of beginner members, in which the user can't post new TOPICS until some certain number of post and days, then they become light and proceed as usual. What happened to that idea.
_________________
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AOL Instant Messenger
Anima
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2002
Location: GA Tech www.gatech.edu
3. PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 6:40 pm    Post subject: Re: How about a restriction on stickie threads... Reply with quote

VxJasonxV wrote:
Anima wrote:
Is it feasible and fair to say that basic members shouldn't be able to post in stickies but only read them until they gain trick status?

It's feasible, but VERY unfair. One person should ruin it for the rest?

Anima wrote:
I mean just exactly what limitations are in place on people who might join and post once to never return? E19.gif

...none.
We have tons of users who register and don't post anything, for one reason or another. And we won't remove these members because they might use it for machine locations and not care about posting.


I dunno if it would be unfair to those who actually have more than a one time interest in the game. I'd like to propose a graduated membership system like Larrikin said. I mean it is a little unfair at first to those who join and genuinely want to jump into the discussion but I think it would weed out a lot more people who haven't yet learned just how many times to click a submit button or those who would randomly interject into conversations to never be heard from again. I think there is something that can be done. There must be some compromise. E13.gif

And since when do you have to join to view machine locations? I don't think that's correct...is it? E19.gif
_________________
Energy. Reality. Fear. Revolt. Trust Yourself, and you'll know the way.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Spike
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 17 Jan 2002
Location: Denver
4. PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

And since when do you have to join to view machine locations? I don't think that's correct...is it?


To submit/edit them.

Quote:

I think it would weed out a lot more people who haven't yet learned just how many times to click a submit button or those who would randomly interject into conversations to never be heard from again.


1) Clicking the submit button too many times (like,say, 4) and then having too many posts (like, say, 4) is a pretty good way of learning what not to do. So keeping them from doing that will just make it so they make the mistake later on in their membership here. If new people come and don't know about the mistake, and don't make the mistake (because they aren't allowed to post) then how would they learn about it? They wouldn't, and in the end they'd make it anyways, just later.

2) Who cares if someone says something and never shows up again? Unless they're asking for help on something and never show back up (but how do we know if they read any answer or not?) then does it really matter? If they make a point and then leave...great. Who cares?

But don't get me wrong, I think that a Beginner Membership could be good where you can't make new topics right away, or something along those lines. But completely restricting you from posting is not something I want to do.
_________________
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Anima
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2002
Location: GA Tech www.gatech.edu
5. PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spike wrote:

1) Clicking the submit button too many times (like,say, 4) and then having too many posts (like, say, 4) is a pretty good way of learning what not to do. So keeping them from doing that will just make it so they make the mistake later on in their membership here. If new people come and don't know about the mistake, and don't make the mistake (because they aren't allowed to post) then how would they learn about it? They wouldn't, and in the end they'd make it anyways, just later.

2) Who cares if someone says something and never shows up again? Unless they're asking for help on something and never show back up (but how do we know if they read any answer or not?) then does it really matter? If they make a point and then leave...great. Who cares?

But don't get me wrong, I think that a Beginner Membership could be good where you can't make new topics right away, or something along those lines. But completely restricting you from posting is not something I want to do.


Let me clarify what i mean. I'm talking about imposing restrictions on the Stickies where the hot discussions take place. I think being able to make posts is essential to learning how to do it correctly and not hitting submit like 4 times, like you said. I just wonder what the effects of a graduated membership would allow and entail, right? Would it be so bad if there was like a 10 post minimum outside of stickies to sorta warm up to the forums? You say that no one cares if someone makes these beginner mistakes but it really is something to think about. I propose it as sort of a way to remove some worry of having to sift through possible messes later on. thumb.gif

As for people posting and then disappearing: Well, you are right. If they say something meaningful or ask a question and never acknowledge that they received the help they wanted...it is pointless to try to stop that. People will use this for a purpose in some instances and nothing more which is regrettable i suppose.

So, if it is still not feasible or appropriate to moderate Basic members from posting to the Stickies then I'd like to second a "Beginner Membership - new topic restriction enabled" or something similar.

Clearly there is a bit of a situation, right? I'm not sure I have the best answer though; i've never been a forum admin. But, I thought something just didn't feel right and I wanted to bring it up to the people who do have a better idea of the situation and the best way to remedy it. And, I'm glad you are all willing to discuss it and with me and not just brush me off. riiight.gif
_________________
Energy. Reality. Fear. Revolt. Trust Yourself, and you'll know the way.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Larrikin
Contributor
Contributor


Joined: 17 Feb 2002
Location: Illadelphia
6. PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also having the beginner mode membership, would effectively kill people being banned and then flooding the board with bad topics. Not many people care 2 weeks later they were banned.
_________________
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AOL Instant Messenger
Cutriss
Staff Member
Staff Member


Joined: 24 Jan 2002
7. PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me just add that doing a(nother) pre-post validation check would be rather DB-intensive, and you can expect the response time on the boards to go back to six months ago.
_________________

Sentient Mode is capable...
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AOL Instant Messenger Xbox Live Gamertag
J Dogg
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Jan 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
8. PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cutriss wrote:
Let me just add that doing a(nother) pre-post validation check would be rather DB-intensive, and you can expect the response time on the boards to go back to six months ago.


Actually, I'm not sure that would be the case. I don't think this check would require another query. We already know whether the opration is posting a new topic or reply, and I believe we already know what kind of member the user is. I haven't checked for sure, though.
_________________
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Anima
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2002
Location: GA Tech www.gatech.edu
9. PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dogg wrote:
Cutriss wrote:
Let me just add that doing a(nother) pre-post validation check would be rather DB-intensive, and you can expect the response time on the boards to go back to six months ago.


Actually, I'm not sure that would be the case. I don't think this check would require another query. We already know whether the opration is posting a new topic or reply, and I believe we already know what kind of member the user is. I haven't checked for sure, though.


Well then that's great. I mean I dunno about the php board software but if it works the way I suspect then the user status being basic would be enough to just turn off the new topic button. It wouldn't require validating a post. laugh.gif Just stop them at the source, the forum main page area. So, will you guys/gals vote on it soon? biggrin.gif
_________________
Energy. Reality. Fear. Revolt. Trust Yourself, and you'll know the way.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
VxJasonxV
Maniac Member
Maniac Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2002
Location: Castle Rock, CO
10. PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anima wrote:
So, will you guys/gals vote on it soon?

It takes more than voting to put it into action.
_________________


Amusing Pictures: lolddrfreak | Road of LoQ
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website Xbox Live Gamertag
Anima
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2002
Location: GA Tech www.gatech.edu
11. PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

VxJasonxV wrote:
Anima wrote:
So, will you guys/gals vote on it soon?

It takes more than voting to put it into action.
Okay, thanks for that much but I'd like a little more possibly? What is the process of getting something like this approved and implemented? I'd like to know if you do. E19.gif Thanks.
_________________
Energy. Reality. Fear. Revolt. Trust Yourself, and you'll know the way.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Cutriss
Staff Member
Staff Member


Joined: 24 Jan 2002
12. PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dogg wrote:
Cutriss wrote:
Let me just add that doing a(nother) pre-post validation check would be rather DB-intensive, and you can expect the response time on the boards to go back to six months ago.
Actually, I'm not sure that would be the case. I don't think this check would require another query. We already know whether the opration is posting a new topic or reply, and I believe we already know what kind of member the user is. I haven't checked for sure, though.
Yeah, but do you know if the thread is a Sticky or not? That's what I was getting at.
_________________

Sentient Mode is capable...
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AOL Instant Messenger Xbox Live Gamertag
PDub
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
13. PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cutriss wrote:
Let me just add that doing a(nother) pre-post validation check would be rather DB-intensive, and you can expect the response time on the boards to go back to six months ago.


What about just adding js to disable the submit button once it's been clicked? Pretty simple, all load is client-side. Worst case, they don't have js enabled and they can submit multiple times, but most folks who go through the trouble to disable it probably aren't the ones multi-posting E13.gif.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
J Dogg
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Jan 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
14. PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cutriss wrote:
Yeah, but do you know if the thread is a Sticky or not? That's what I was getting at.


Actually, I was referring to Larrikin's idea, not Anima's. I don't know offhand about whether we know if it's a sticky or not.

However, I don't agree with either of their ideas. I don't think it's fair to force a new person to post replies just to get permission to post topics. Also, I don't think it's fair to lock a new person out of a sticky thread. Despite the number of stupid newbies that we see, there are also a good number of legit users who lurk before posting.
_________________
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
dj Tifaheart
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 02 May 2003
Location: Middletown, RI
15. PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dogg wrote:
Cutriss wrote:
Yeah, but do you know if the thread is a Sticky or not? That's what I was getting at.


Actually, I was referring to Larrikin's idea, not Anima's. I don't know offhand about whether we know if it's a sticky or not.

However, I don't agree with either of their ideas. I don't think it's fair to force a new person to post replies just to get permission to post topics. Also, I don't think it's fair to lock a new person out of a sticky thread. Despite the number of stupid newbies that we see, there are also a good number of legit users who lurk before posting.


Exactly.

Another valid point is: What if one of us looses our account somehow...like we disappear for over four months. Then we would have to get a new account and start all over as Basic members.

Would you want to be blocked from the Stickie threads? Not be able to post new topics because you have to start fresh again? That would suck.
_________________


Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AOL Instant Messenger
Anima
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2002
Location: GA Tech www.gatech.edu
16. PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dogg wrote:
Cutriss wrote:
Yeah, but do you know if the thread is a Sticky or not? That's what I was getting at.


Actually, I was referring to Larrikin's idea, not Anima's. I don't know offhand about whether we know if it's a sticky or not.

However, I don't agree with either of their ideas. I don't think it's fair to force a new person to post replies just to get permission to post topics. Also, I don't think it's fair to lock a new person out of a sticky thread. Despite the number of stupid newbies that we see, there are also a good number of legit users who lurk before posting.
I'm saying give the new members read access but disallow write access to the Stickies which are the main conversation topics. As for new users who lurk before posting, allow them to lurk all they want but make it clear what must be done in order to advance status. Right now it's based on making posts in order to get to Trick level.

Actually I found the perfect solution to what my problem was: the multiple postings at once. It's called "topic flood control". It stops users, exclusing admins and mods, from posting more than once within a given time frame. I'm not sure if it is installed or not but if it were then I doubt the multiple submissions would have been allowed.
The link is here
_________________
Energy. Reality. Fear. Revolt. Trust Yourself, and you'll know the way.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
J Dogg
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Jan 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
17. PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anima wrote:
I'm saying give the new members read access but disallow write access to the Stickies which are the main conversation topics. As for new users who lurk before posting, allow them to lurk all they want but make it clear what must be done in order to advance status. Right now it's based on making posts in order to get to Trick level.


And I'm saying it's unfair to lock them out of stickies. And it's not productive to make a lurker make pointless posts in order to gain posting privileges later. I'd rather them start off by posting what they want instead of doing pre-emptive posting. Also, trick level isn't just based on # of posts. In addition, we already restrict the users from posting for the first few hours after joining.

Anima wrote:

Actually I found the perfect solution to what my problem was: the multiple postings at once. It's called "topic flood control". It stops users, exclusing admins and mods, from posting more than once within a given time frame. I'm not sure if it is installed or not but if it were then I doubt the multiple submissions would have been allowed.
The link is here


We do this already... try posting multiple times in a minute.
_________________
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Cutriss
Staff Member
Staff Member


Joined: 24 Jan 2002
18. PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 6:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dogg wrote:
Anima wrote:
Actually I found the perfect solution to what my problem was: the multiple postings at once. It's called "topic flood control". It stops users, exclusing admins and mods, from posting more than once within a given time frame. I'm not sure if it is installed or not but if it were then I doubt the multiple submissions would have been allowed.
The link is here
We do this already... try posting multiple times in a minute.
The problem that got her worked up in the first place was someone accidentally quadruple-posting. I agree, the dupe-posting is a bit of a hassle, but it's more of a hassle for mods/admins than it is for the users (since the users just have to scroll past it - we have to delete it).

PDub has a good idea, I think. Putting a JavaScript container around the submit buttons (both of them) wouldn't be a bad idea.
_________________

Sentient Mode is capable...
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AOL Instant Messenger Xbox Live Gamertag
PDub
Trick Member
Trick Member


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
19. PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J Dogg wrote:
In addition, we already restrict the users from posting for the first few hours after joining.


Sort of a sidebar, it would have been nice to know this when registering. I was a lurker for awhile, and saw a topic that I could actually help with. So, I decided to register, and went to post a reply and got the nice 'You are unable to post' prompt letting me know I had to wait a few hours.

Although minor, and I understand the reasons, it was frustrating and discouraging enough to consider not even bothering to post at all. It might be at least less frustrating if there was some obvious prompt somewhere that said "After registration, you will be unable to post for 3 hours" or something equivalent.

Just my two pennies...

Cutriss (I can't spell) wrote:
PDub has a good idea, I think. Putting a JavaScript container around the submit buttons (both of them) wouldn't be a bad idea.


E4.gif
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies    DDR Freak Forum Index -> Site Feedback All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group